The Healing Crisis After an Attunement is a Design Choice, Not a Spiritual Necessity

Picture of Dr Lisa Turner

Dr Lisa Turner

World renowned visionary, author, high-performance mindset trainer for coaches to elevate skills, empower clients to achieve their maximum potential

If you have ever received an attunement, an activation, or an initiation of any kind, you were

probably warned about the period afterwards. A few difficult days. Old material surfacing.

Possibly some physical discomfort. This is normal, you were told, and it is a sign that the work

is taking. The field calls it a healing crisis.

I want to suggest something less comfortable. That period is not a spiritual necessity. It is

what happens when you flood a system that has not been cleared or repaired first, and it is the

predictable consequence of a particular order of operations.

WHAT AN INITIATION IS DOING

Strip the language away and any initiation is doing two things at once. It is raising the amount

of energy moving through a person, and it is expanding the capacity of the nervous system that

has to carry it. Both have to happen, and they have to happen in a workable relationship to each

other.

Increase the energy without increasing the capacity and you have a straightforward engineering

problem. The system cannot conduct what is being pushed through it. Energy accumulates where it

cannot pass, and is absent on the other side of the obstruction, and the nervous system reads

that differential as something being wrong. It reports this in the only language it has, which

is sensation and emotion. Difficult days. Old material. Physical discomfort.

Read that way, the crisis is not evidence that the work is taking. It is evidence about the

sequence.

THE ORDER MOST TRADITIONS USE

The dominant pattern across a lot of energy traditions is to open the channel first and then

manage the fallout. There are reasons for this that are not sinister. The energy is the

dramatic part and the part people came for. It produces an experience they can feel, which is

what makes them confident they received something. Clearing is slow, unglamorous, and produces

very little that anybody would describe afterwards as profound.

There is also a structural convenience to it, and this is where I would ask people to be more

sceptical than they usually are. When difficulty afterwards is defined in advance as a sign of

success, no outcome can count as a mistake. The person who feels wonderful received the

transmission. The person who feels wretched is clearing. Both results confirm the method.

Anything that cannot fail to be confirmed is not being tested.

THE ORDER I USE INSTEAD

Clear first. Repair the nervous system. Expand it. Then increase the energy.

Clearing means removing the specific interpretations that keep generating charge, so there is

less material sitting in the system waiting to be dislodged. Repair means attending to the

places where the capacity to conduct has been damaged, usually by something the person did not

choose. Expansion means increasing what the system can carry before any additional energy is

introduced at all.

Only then does the flooding stage happen, and when the first three have been done properly, the

fourth is frequently the least eventful part of the whole process. People sometimes find this

disappointing. They expected the significant part to feel significant. What they got instead was

something that went in without incident, because the preparation was the significant part and it

happened weeks earlier.

WHAT THIS CHANGES FOR A PRACTITIONER

You stop attributing to the client what belongs to the method

When somebody has a hard time after receiving something from you, the available explanations

are usually about them. They had a lot to clear. They were not as ready as they presented. Their

system is sensitive. Every one of those may be true, and every one of them puts the cause safely

outside your own design. Sequence is the explanation that implicates you, which is precisely why

it is worth checking first.

You gain a question that sorts the field quickly

Ask anybody offering an attunement what happens before the energy is raised. Not what happens

afterwards, which everybody has an answer for. Before. If the answer is a period of preparation

with a describable purpose, you are dealing with somebody who has thought about the mechanism.

If the answer is that the energy finds its own level, or that the recipient’s higher self will

regulate the process, you have learned that there is no preparation stage and that the

difficulty afterwards is the preparation, applied retrospectively, to the person rather than by

them.

You can decline without insulting anybody

This is not an accusation of bad faith against a whole field. Most people teaching these

traditions received them in the same order and are passing on what they were given. But

inheriting a sequence is not the same as having examined it, and you are allowed to want the

examined version without implying that anybody lied to you.

THE PART WORTH SITTING WITH

Somewhere in this field there is a phrase for almost every difficulty a method produces, and

each of those phrases performs the same quiet service. It converts a result into a

confirmation.

A healing crisis, a purge, a clearing, a dark night. Some of these describe something real. All

of them are also extremely convenient, and the convenience is worth noticing.

The question is not whether the difficult period happened. It is whether anybody can tell you,

in advance and in mechanical terms, why it was necessary.

Share:

Related Posts

A Glimpse is Not a Mechanism

A teacher known for glimpse-based awakening practices, the short pointers and micro-meditations that give somebody a direct taste of spaciousness, is appearing this autumn at

Consent Management Platform by Real Cookie Banner